Search This Blog

Monday, March 7, 2016

Long Work Hours Linked to Higher Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Over a Decade or Longer, Risk Increases Beyond 45 Hours per Week

Long Work Hours Linked to Heart Disease Risk
Newswise, March 7, 2016— Working long hours—particularly 46 hours per week or more—may increase the long-term risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events such as heart attack, reports a study in the March Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, official publication of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM).

"In general, we found that the risk of CVD increased as the average weekly working hours increased," write Sadie H. Conway, PhD, of University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, and colleagues. 

They note that among full-time workers, CVD risk appears lowest between 40 and 45 hours per week.

The researchers analyzed the relationship between work hours and CVD using data on more than 1,900 participants from a long-term follow-up study of work and health. 

All participants had been employed for at least ten years. During the study, a physician-diagnosed CVD event—angina, coronary heart disease or heart failure, heart attack, high blood pressure, or stroke—occurred in about 43 percent of participants.

Risk of CVD events increased by one percent for each additional hour worked per week over at least ten years, after adjustment for age, sex, racial/ethnic group, and pay status. 

The difference was significant only for full-time workers, not part-timers. Among those who worked more than 30 hours per week, risk increased as weekly hours approached 40, but then decreased again between 40 and 45 hours per week.

Beginning at 46 hours, increasing work hours were progressively associated with increased risk of CVD. Compared to people who averaged 45 hours per week for ten years or longer, overall CVD risk was increased by 16 percent for those who worked 55 hours per week and by 35 percent for those who worked 60 hours per week.


While previous research has suggested increased CVD risk with longer working hours, the new study is the first to show a "dose-response" effect. 

Dr. Conway comments, "This study provides specific evidence on long work hours and an increase the risk of CVD, thereby providing a foundation for CVD prevention efforts focused on work schedule practices, which may reduce the risk of CVD for millions of working Americans."

The Medical Minute: Eight Things to Know About Colorectal Cancer

Medical Minute 8 things to know about colon Cancer
Newswise, March 7, 2016— March is colorectal cancer awareness month –- a great time to test your knowledge about the disease and how it can be prevented and treated. Below, two doctors from Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center highlight eight things you may not have known:

1. Colorectal cancer is the only type of cancer that doctors can prevent by screening for it. “Unlike most of the time, when you are trying to find early stages of cancer, we can prevent this disease from even happening by removing polyps,” said Dr. Thomas McGarrity, chief of the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

2. National recommendations that call for everyone to get screened for colorectal cancer starting at age 50 have led to a decrease in the cases of colorectal cancers. “We think that’s because more people are getting screened,” McGarrity said. The American Cancer Society has a target of having 80 percent of eligible people screened for colorectal cancers by 2018.

3. Factors such as race and ethnicity, genetics and lifestyle play a role in your likelihood of developing such a cancer. African Americans are more likely than Caucasians to get colorectal cancer. Yet Caucasians get it more often than Hispanics and Asians. Those who have a first-degree relative with large polyps or colorectal cancer should get screened earlier and more often. Staying fit by exercising and having a normal body weight – along with not smoking – also help your chances of preventing the disease.

4. A Mediterranean diet is not only good for your heart, but your colon as well. This means less red meat and more fiber from sources such as fresh fruits and vegetables.

5. The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force recommended in September that every man and woman with a risk of heart disease take an aspirin a day. This is to prevent not only heart attacks and stroke, but also colon cancer. However, McGarrity said it’s important to check with your family doctor before starting a daily aspirin regimen.

6. When caught early, colorectal cancers are very curable. And only about 10 percent of cases require a permanent colostomy, according to Dr. Walter Koltun, chief of the Division of Colorectal Surgery.

7. A multi-disciplinary approach to treatment produces the best outcomes for patients. Although surgery is the most important part of the treatment triad, chemotherapy and radiation augment the likelihood of a cure.


8. Treatment options have improved. "Increasingly, the surgery we do is robotic and minimally invasive," Koltun said. "Over the past 15 years, we have developed much more effective chemotherapy that has allowed us to treat not only patients with curable cancer, but also those with very advanced stages of it and give them a higher chance of cure."

Low Vision Patients Don’t Suffer Alone Thanks to New Support Group

New Support Groiup Helps Low Vision Seniors
Newswise, March 7, 2016 — A slip and fall with his face hitting a concrete step left David French with a detached retina in one eye and damage in the other. He now faces life with diminished or low vision. 

While not totally blind, French lacks the ability to make out objects a few feet away, read materials or see at night without the aid of powerful equipment.

French is one of more than 350 patients annually seen in the Low Vision Clinic at Harris Health System’s Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital. Patients suffering from congenital diseases like glaucoma or cataracts, diabetic retinopathy or macular degeneration to victims of trauma or stroke get a chance to regain some vision independence.

Patients are evaluated and paired up with high-powered lenses like magnifying glasses, telescopes or electronic magnifiers. 

Additionally, they work with an occupational therapist who trains patients on the equipment or ways to maximize their vision levels. Now, patients also have access to a new support group where like-diagnosed patients can share and learn from each other.

“It’s a place where people are like you and you can relate,” French says. “It’s where if you make a mistake, you don’t have to worry because most of the people in the group are going to make the same mistakes. I don’t know what I’m doing all the time, so it’s good to be with others who don’t either.”
Regina Budet, occupational therapist, LBJ Hospital, and support group coordinator, says having patients learn and motivate each other is a major reason for the group.

“They need to know they’re not alone,” she says. “There are others facing the same issues they encounter on a daily basis. It’s also a great way for them to get out, socialize and talk in a comfortable setting.”

For French, opportunities to get out and socialize are few. He relies on others to drive him places. His nephew takes him out often. However, they limit their visits to locations, stores and restaurants French had frequented prior to his vision loss. In restaurants, he feels most comfortable when he knows the layout of restrooms and seating areas.

“I don’t ever want to walk into a women’s restroom,” he says. “That would not be good.”

The Low Vision Clinic, the only one at Harris Health, is in its third year of operation. Staff works with various organizations and agencies like the Texas State Department of Health Services to provide patients with free or discounted vision aids. 

Support groups and others training tools are funded through the Harris County Low Vision Project, funded by a Lions Clubs International Foundation SightFirst grant.

“With low vision, it’s hard to tell that other people have the same problem when you look at them,” says Dr. Bhavani Iyer, director, Low Vision Clinic, LBJ Hospital, and clinical assistant professor, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth). “When someone’s completely blind, they look and act different. But a lot of times, people with low vision don’t act different or look different, but suffer silently.”

For his part, French is excited about the group and the arrival of a high-powered monocular lens set that he thinks will open up greater opportunities for independence and allow him to do more activities including one of his favorite pastimes of fishing.

“I’ll be able to see from two feet to infinity,” he gushingly says of his new eyepiece. “Right now, I can only think about how much I want to do what I used to do in the past. So when I get my new lenses, I’m going to explore and maybe go fishing again.”


For more information about the support group, call Regina Budet at 713-873-4728 or by e-mail at regina.budet@harrishealth.org

Thursday, March 3, 2016

. Cancer patients with limited finances are more likely to have increased symptoms and poorer quality of life

Cancer Patients with limited finance more likely to have poorer quality of life.
• Study can help doctors direct resources and treatments for those patients who were already struggling before their cancer diagnosis

Newswise, March 3, 2016 — If you’re a lung or colorectal cancer patient, what’s in your wallet could determine your level of suffering and quality of life during treatment, according to a new study by Dana Farber Cancer Institute researchers. The findings appear in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Most of the studies looking at financial stress look at what cancer does to your finances after diagnosis,” said Christopher Lathan, MD, MS, MPH, lead author of the study and a thoracic oncologist at Dana-Farber.

“We were interested in looking at what happens when you have financial distress, defined in our study as little or no savings at the time of your diagnosis, and how that factor can impact quality of life.”

In the study, researchers looked to measure the association between patient financial strain and symptom burden and quality of life (QOL) for patients with new diagnoses of lung or colorectal cancer.

Patients participating in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance study were interviewed about their financial reserves, QOL, and symptom burden at 4 months of diagnosis and, for survivors, at 12 months of diagnosis.

Researchers assessed the association of patient-reported financial reserves with patient-reported outcomes, including the Brief Pain Inventory, symptom burden on the basis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, and QOL on the basis of the EuroQoL-5 Dimension scale.

Among patients with lung and colorectal cancer, 40 percent and 33 percent, respectively, reported limited financial reserves. Relative to patients with more than 12 months of financial reserves, those with limited financial reserves reported significantly increased pain for lung and colorectal symptoms, greater symptom burden, and poorer QOL.

With decreasing financial reserves, a clear dose-response relationship was present across all measures of well-being. These associations were also manifest for survivors reporting outcomes again at 1 year and persisted after adjustment for stage, co-morbidity, insurance, and other clinical attributes.

“We found that patients who had financial distress at the time of diagnosis were more likely to have poorer outcomes in physical and mental quality of life measures, pain, and symptom burden,” noted Lathan.

“This effect persisted after adjusting for stage of disease, co-morbidity, income, age, and insurance.”


Researchers say the findings highlight the need to evaluate patients for potential financial distress at the time of diagnosis and to allow for clinicians to target appropriate resources and treatments for those patients who were already struggling before their cancer diagnosis. 

PET Scans Reveal Key Details of Alzheimer’s Protein Growth in Aging Brains

Alzheimer's Protein Growth in Aging Brains
March 3, 2016--New research led by scientists at UC Berkeley shows for the first time that PET scans can track the progressive stages of Alzheimer’s disease in cognitively normal adults, a key advance in the early diagnosis and staging of the neurodegenerative disorder.

In the process, the scientists also obtained important clues about two Alzheimer’s-linked proteins – tau and beta-amyloid – and how they relate to each other.

The findings, published March 2 in the journal Neuron, come from positron emission tomography (PET) of 53 adults. Five were young adults aged 20-26, 33 were cognitively healthy adults aged 64-90 and 15 were patients aged 53-77 who had been diagnosed with probable Alzheimer’s dementia.

The stages of tau deposition were established by German researchers Heiko and Eva Braak through post-mortem analysis of the brains of suspected Alzheimer’s patients.

“Braak staging was developed through data obtained from autopsies, but our study is the first to show the staging in people who are not only alive, but who have no signs of cognitive impairment,” said study principal investigator Dr. William Jagust, a professor at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health and at the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and a faculty scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. “This opens the door to the use of PET scans as a diagnostic and staging tool.”

PET scans are used to detect early signs of disease by looking at cellular-level changes in organs and tissue. The results of the scans in this study paralleled Braak neuropathological stages, which range from one to six, describing the degree of tau protein accumulation in the brain.
Jagust worked with study co-lead authors Michael Schöll, a visiting scholar, and Samuel Lockhart, a postdoctoral fellow, both at UC Berkeley’s Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute.


Tau vs. amyloid
Their findings also shed light on the nature of tau and amyloid protein deposits in the aging brain. For many years, the accumulation of beta amyloid plaques was considered the primary culprit in Alzheimer’s disease. Over the past decade, however, tau, a microtubule protein important in maintaining the structure of neurons, has emerged as a major player. When the tau protein gets tangled and twisted, its ability to support synaptic connections becomes impaired.

While a number of symptoms exist that signal Alzheimer’s disease, a definitive diagnosis has been possible only through an examination of the brain after the patient has died. The availability of amyloid imaging for the past decade has improved this situation, but how Alzheimer’s developed as a result of amyloid remains a mystery. Studies done in autopsies linked the development of symptoms to the deposition of the tau protein.

Through the PET scans, the researchers confirmed that with advancing age, tau protein accumulated in the medial temporal lobe — home to the hippocampus and the memory center of the brain.

“Tau is basically present in almost every aging brain,” said Schöll, who holds an appointment at Sweden’s University of Gothenburg. “Very few old people have no tau. In our case, it seems like the accumulation of tau in the medial temporal lobe was independent of amyloid and driven by age.”

The study revealed that higher levels of tau in the medial temporal lobe was associated with greater declines in episodic memory, the type of memory used to code new information. The researchers tested episodic memory by asking subjects to recall a list of words viewed 20 minutes earlier.

Both proteins involved in dementia

One question yet to be answered is why so many people have tau in their medial temporal lobe yet never go on to develop Alzheimer’s. Likewise, adults may have beta amyloid in their brains and yet be cognitively healthy.

“It’s not that one is more important than the other,” said Lockhart. “Our study suggests that they may work together in the progression of Alzheimer’s.”
.
While higher levels of tau in the medial temporal lobe was linked to more problems with episodic memory, it was when tau spread outside this region to other parts of the brain, such as the neocortex, that researchers saw more serious declines in global cognitive function. Significantly, they found that tau’s spread outside the medial temporal lobe was connected to the presence of amyloid plaques in the brain.

“Amyloid may somehow facilitate the spread of tau, or tau may initiate the deposition of amyloid. We don’t know. We can’t answer that at this point,” said Jagust. “All I can say is that when amyloid starts to show up, we start to see tau in other parts of the brain, and that is when real problems begin. We think that may be the beginning of symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease.”

What the study does indicate is that tau imaging could become an important tool in helping to develop therapeutic approaches that target the correct protein — either amyloid or tau — depending on the disease stage, the researchers said.


Funding from the National Institutes of Health helped support this research.

Routine Colonoscopies Save Lives

March is Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month

March is Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month
Newswise, March 3, 2016 — Stan Quinn’s routine colonoscopy may have saved his life.

When Mr. Quinn, 57, became a new patient at Loyola University Health System last year, his physician prescribed a routine colonoscopy to catch him up on preventive health recommendations.

“I didn’t think anything of it, just that it was a routine exam that was going to reveal nothing wrong,” said Mr. Quinn, who was not experiencing any health problems. “What they actually found was a mass that was too big to remove during the colonoscopy.”

March is Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month and the message is simple: this disease is highly preventable. Colorectal cancer is 100 percent preventable through screenings that detect and remove small, pre-cancerous growths called polyps.

Loyola staff will raise awareness for the prevention of colon cancer by wearing blue next Friday, March 4, in support of National Dress in Blue Day™.

Cancer of the colon or rectum is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among both men and women in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 140,000 Americans are diagnosed annually with colorectal cancer, and more than 50,000 people die from it.

“Colorectal cancer really should get the same attention as breast cancer, prostate cancer and skin cancer,” said Theodore Saclarides, MD, division director of colorectal surgery at Loyola. “Regular screenings really do save lives.”

“It is now clear that not every colonoscopy is equal,” says Neil Gupta, MD, co-director of the digestive health program and director of interventional endoscopy at Loyola. “Once you’ve decided it’s time to get a screening colonoscopy, the next step is to make sure that you get a high quality one.”

Loyola offers all of the colorectal cancer screening tests that are recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force and national medical societies. There are two types of colorectal cancer screening tests: tests that detect colorectal cancer and tests that can detect both colorectal cancer and pre-cancerous polyps, Dr. Gupta said. Colonoscopy, CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy), and flexible sigmoidoscopy are all screening tests that can detect colorectal cancer and pre-cancerous polyps.
Stool tests for blood or DNA (such as fecal occult blood test, fecal immunochemical test, or cologuard) are designed to detect colorectal cancer only.

Get checked, Dr. Saclarides advises, if:
You have a change in bowel habits.
You reach an age at which a colonoscopy is recommended. Current guidelines recommend that everyone get screened for colorectal cancer starting at the age of 50.
Your lifestyle and family history predispose you to colon cancer. People with a family history of colorectal cancer or polyps, people with inflammatory bowel disease (such as Crohn’s disease or Ulcerative colitis), and people with hereditary cancer syndromes should start screening earlier.
Loyola physicians perform high quality colonoscopies, performing consistently above the national average on colonoscopy quality measures, including being able to examine the entire colon (cecal intubation rate), having a good bowel prep during the colonoscopy, and detection of pre-cancerous polyps (adenoma detection rate).

“The higher your physician’s adenoma detection rate, the less chance you have of developing colon cancer after your colonoscopy,” said Dr. Gupta, who has an adenoma detection rate of more than 50 percent, meaning he has removed pre-cancerous polyps in more than 50 percent of the screening colonoscopies he has performed. “An adenoma detection rate of at least 20 percent is currently considered a minimum benchmark.”

In addition to the clinic, Loyola treats patients at the GI cancer risk assessment program, where gastroenterologists and geneticists examine and assign a risk to concerned patients.

After Mr. Quinn’s colonoscopy, a biopsy revealed the tumor might be early cancer so the mass had to be removed quickly. Mr. Quinn was referred immediately to Dr. Saclarides, who removed a portion of the colon through laparoscopic surgery, a less-invasive technique involving a small incision, less blood loss and a faster recovery time.

“Stan is basically cured,” Dr. Saclarides said. “And it is all thanks to his getting a colonoscopy, his physicians recommending him to a colorectal surgeon and his being compliant and following through with the procedure.”
Randomized Trials Network Collaborative Research Group.
The National Institutes of Health funded research efforts critical to the study.

Common Blood Test Could Predict Risk of 2nd Stroke

Elevated levels of enzyme linked to increased likelihood of ischemic stroke

Simple Blood Test Could Predict of Risk of Second Stroke

Newswise, March 3, 2016 — A new discovery about ischemic stroke may allow to doctors to predict a patient’s risk of having a second stroke using a commonly performed blood test and their genetic profile.

The researchers have linked high levels of C-Reactive Protein, an enzyme found in the blood, with increased risk for recurrent ischemic stroke. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is produced in the liver in response to inflammation, and it is already checked to measure people’s risk of developing coronary artery disease. 

The new research suggests it could be a useful tool for ischemic stroke patients as well.

“The biggest risk of death for someone who has already had a stroke is to have another one,” said University of Virginia School of Medicine researcher Stephen Williams, PhD. “So it’s really important to be able to try and target those individuals who are at the highest risk for the thing that very well may kill them.”

Ischemic Stroke Risk

Ischemic strokes result from blockages preventing blood flow to the brain; they are responsible for approximately 85 percent of all stroke cases. (Hemorrhagic strokes, on the other hand, occur when blood vessels burst and bleed into the brain.)

To better understand ischemic stroke, Williams and his colleagues set out to determine how our genes affect the levels of biomarkers such as CRP in our blood. Not only did they find that elevated CRP levels suggest increased stroke risk, they identified gene variations that drive those risks.

“So we have the genetics influencing [CRP] levels, which then increases the risk of having a recurrent stroke. Then we went back and said alright, can we predict the increased risk purely based on the genetics, which we were able to do,” Williams said.

“There’s this shared genetic susceptibility not only for increased C-Reactive Protein but for increased risk for stroke. We could estimate what’s called a hazard ratio – basically the increased risk for having or not having a second stroke – based on the genetics.”

Williams envisions a day when doctors might focus on CRP levels and a patient’s genetic makeup to determine their overall risk for a second stroke. But even CRP levels alone could be a useful tool in assessing risk after the initial stroke.

“Getting a CRP measure on someone is really simple. It’s just a blood draw. You don’t have to take something like a biopsy which patients might have an aversion to,” Williams said. “It’s not very expensive, and it’s part of routine workups that could be done for patients. However, combined with genetic information we may have even more power to identify those at greatest risk.”

Findings Published
The findings have been published online by the scientific journal Neurology in an article written by Williams, Fang-Chi Hsu, Keith L. Keene, Wei-Min Chen, Sarah Nelson, Andrew M. Southerland, Ebony B. Madden, Bruce Coull, Stephanie M. Gogarten, Karen L. Furie, Godfrey Dzhivhuho, Joe L. Rowles, Prachi Mehndiratta, Rainer Malik, Josée Dupuis, Honghuang Lin, Sudha Seshadri, Stephen S. Rich, Michèle M. Sale