“Substantial
contribution of extrinsic risk factors to cancer development” publishes
December 16 in Nature
Newswise, December 29, 2015– A
team of researchers from Stony Brook University, led by Yusuf Hannun, MD, the
Joel Strum Kenny Professor in Cancer Research and Director of the Stony Brook
University Cancer Center, have found quantitative evidence proving that
extrinsic risk factors, such as environmental exposures and behaviors weigh
heavily on the development of a vast majority (approximately 70 to 90 percent)
of cancers.
The finding, reported in the December 16 online issue of Nature,
in a paper titled “Substantial contribution of extrinsic risk factors to cancer
development,” may be important for strategizing cancer prevention, research and
public health.
Inspired by a January 2015 research paper in Science, which concluded that the majority of the
variation in cancer risk among tissues is due to “bad luck,” the Stony Brook
team used the same data to assess what leads to the risk of developing cancer.
The interdisciplinary team of researchers from the Departments of Applied
Mathematics and Statistics, Medicine, Pathology and Biochemistry, concluded the
opposite – that most cancers are the result of external risk factors.
“Cancer is caused by mutations in the DNA of cells, which
leads to uncontrolled cell growth instead of orderly growth. But the
development of cancer is a complex issue, and we as a scientific community need
to have solid analytical models to investigate what intrinsic and extrinsic
factors cause certain forms of cancer,” said Dr. Hannun, senior author of the
paper.
“Many scientists argued against the ‘bad luck’ or ‘random
mutation’ theory of cancer but provided no alternative analysis to quantify the
contribution of external risk factors,” explained Song Wu, PhD, lead author of
the paper, and Assistant Professor in the Department of Applied Mathematics and
Statistics, Stony Brook University.
“Our paper provides an alternative analysis
by applying four distinct analytic approaches.”
They developed four distinct approaches to assess cancer risk.
With these four approaches, they discovered collectively and individually that
most cancers are attributed largely to external risk factors, with only
10-to-30 percent attributed to random mutations, or intrinsic factors.
First, the researchers examined extrinsic risks by tissue cell
turnover. In a data-driven approach, they re-examined the quantitative
relationship between observed lifetime risk of cancer (ie, for lung,
pancreatic, colorectal and other tissues) and division of the normal tissue
stem cells in those groups reported in the Science paper.
If intrinsic risk
factors played a major role, the tissue with the similar stem cell divisions
would show similar observed lifetime cancer risk. They found this pattern to be
a rare one, and thus determined intrinsic factors played a vital role in only
about 10 percent of cancers.
These results are supported by strong
epidemiologic evidence; for example studies showing that immigrants moving from
countries with lower cancer incidence to countries with higher rates of cancer
incidence acquire the higher risk in their new country.
The researchers also mathematically surveyed and analyzed
recent studies on mutational signatures in cancer, which are regarded as
“fingerprints” left on cancer genomes by different mutagenic processes.
Some 30
distinct signatures among various cancers were identified. They analyzed the
signatures and categorized them as having intrinsic or extrinsic origins.
They
found that while a few forms of cancer had a greater than 50 percent of intrinsic
mutations, the majority of cancers, such as colorectal, lung, bladder and
thyroid cancers had large proportions of mutations likely caused by extrinsic
factors.
The team also analyzed the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiologic
and End Results Program) data, which showed that many cancers have been
increasing in incidence and in mortality, suggesting that external factors
contribute heavily to these cancers.
Lastly, they used computational modeling to dissect the
contribution of the intrinsic processes in the development of cancer, based on
known gene mutations in cancer and the likelihood that they arise from
intrinsic mutation rates.
They found that when three or more mutations are
required for cancer onset (which is a currently accepted parameter), intrinsic
factors are far from sufficient to account for the observed risks, indicating
small percentages of intrinsic cancer risks in many cancers.
The four methods involved both data- and model-driven
quantitative analyses, with and without using the stem cell estimations. The
idea behind the overall approach was to assess cancer risk by multiple methods
and not by a single type of analysis.
Dr. Hannun concluded that their overall approach “provides a
new framework to quantify the lifetime cancer risks from both intrinsic and
extrinsic factors, which will have important consequences for strategizing
cancer prevention, research and public health.”
Co-authors of the paper include: Scott Powers of the
Department of Pathology at Stony Brook University, and Wei Zhu, of the
Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics at Stony Brook University.
All
of the authors are collaborating investigators at the Stony Brook University
Cancer Center.
Part of the State University of New York system, Stony Brook University encompasses 200 buildings on 1,450 acres. Since welcoming its first incoming class in 1957, the University has grown tremendously, now with more than 25,000 students and 2,500 faculty.
Its membership in the prestigious Association of
American Universities (AAU) places Stony Brook among the top 62 research
institutions in North America. U.S. News & World Report ranks Stony Brook
among the top 100 universities in the nation and top 40 public universities,
and Kiplinger names it one of the 35 best values in public colleges.
One of
four University Center campuses in the SUNY system, Stony Brook co-manages
Brookhaven National Laboratory, putting it in an elite group of universities
that run federal research and development laboratories. A global ranking by
U.S. News & World Report places Stony Brook in the top 1 percent of
institutions worldwide.
It is one of only 10 universities nationwide recognized
by the National Science Foundation for combining research with undergraduate education.
As the largest single-site employer on Long Island, Stony Brook is a driving
force of the regional economy, with an annual economic impact of $4.65 billion,
generating nearly 60,000 jobs, and accounts for nearly 4 percent of all
economic activity in Nassau and Suffolk counties, and roughly 7.5 percent of
total jobs in Suffolk County.
No comments:
Post a Comment