Newswise, March 18, 2016-- Used in combination, two innovative rehabilitation approaches can
promote better long-term recovery of arm and hand movement function in stroke
survivors, suggests a paper in the American
Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, the official journal
of the Association of Academic
Physiatrists. The journal is published by Wolters Kluwer.
Adding peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to
"constraint-based" therapy enhances recovery of movement in the
affected arm and hand—even more than one year after a stroke, according to the
study by Dr. Lumy Sawaki and colleagues of University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Adding Nerve Stimulation Improves Results of
Constraint-Based Therapy
The preliminary study evaluated the effects of combining two emerging approaches to post-stroke rehabilitation of partial paralysis (hemiparesis). Constraint-induced therapy (CIT) is an approach that forces "intensive, task-oriented use" of the affected hand. This is done by limiting movement of the less-affected hand, forcing the patient to use the partially paralyzed limb.
Peripheral nerve stimulation consists of non-invasive,
low-level electrical stimulation applied to the nerves in the paralyzed arm
muscles, which in turn increases activity in the brain area that controls the
arm. Both CIT and PNS take advantage of the brain's potential for
"neuroplasticity"—the ability to reorganize or "rewire"
itself after injury.
The study included 19 stroke survivors who were left with mild
to moderate hemiparesis of one upper limb, at least one year after a stroke.
All received a modified CIT approach, including wearing a padded mitt on the
less-affected hand during therapy sessions. Subjects were also asked to wear
the mitt for 90 percent of waking hours during their daily lives.
In addition, subjects received either active or
"sham" (inactive) PNS, delivered through electrodes placed on the
affected arm. At each session, PNS was applied for two hours, followed by four
hours of CIT.
After ten sessions, arm and hand function improved for both
groups. But on most measures, improvement was significantly greater for
patients who received active PNS added to CIT. Grip strength was the only
measure to show no significant added advantage with active PNS.
Significant differences between groups persisted to one-month
follow-up. "Compared with the sham PNS group, the active PNS group may
have made more extensive use of the affected upper extremity in settings
outside the lab, such as in activities of daily living," Dr. Sawaki and
coauthors write. However, they caution that further studies are needed to
provide conclusive evidence in this regard.
There's a crucial need for treatments to enhance long-term
recovery of function after a stroke—particularly after the first year, when
most spontaneous improvement occurs. Both CIT and PNS can enhance movement
function after stroke. The new study is the first to suggest that combining
these two techniques can lead to further improvement in arm and hand movement
in stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate chronic hemiparesis.
"It appears that PNS has enormous promise as a clinical
intervention to enhance outcomes of motor training for stroke survivors with
mild to moderate hemiparesis," Dr. Sawaki and colleagues conclude. They
emphasize the need for further research to maximize the benefits of combined
PNS and other rehabilitation techniques—including studies to optimize the PNS
sites and settings and the other approaches used.
No comments:
Post a Comment