Error signals in motor
cortices drive adaptation in reaching
Newswise, July 29, 2016--Adaptation
in reaching -- gradual improvement of motor control in response to a
perturbation -- is a central issue in motor neuroscience.However, even the
cortical origin of errors that drive adaptation has remained elusive. In a new
paper published in Neuron, Inoue, Uchimura and Kitazawa have shown
that error signals encoded by motor cortical neurons drive adaptation in
reaching.
• The premotor and primary motor cortices encoded visual error
in reaching.
• Stimulation to the motor cortices induced trial-by-trial increases in reach errors.
• The error increased opposite to the preferred direction of errors at each location.
• The after-effect of stimulation subsided gradually as in ordinary adaptation.
• Stimulation to the motor cortices induced trial-by-trial increases in reach errors.
• The error increased opposite to the preferred direction of errors at each location.
• The after-effect of stimulation subsided gradually as in ordinary adaptation.
The neural mechanisms of motor learning and adaptation
constitute a central issue in both basic and clinical neuroscience.
However, it is surprising that very little is known about the
neural mechanisms underlying the motor learning and adaptation of voluntary arm
movements. For example, the origin of cortical error signals that drive
adaptation in reaching remains an unanswered question.
A major theory in motor learning (feedback error learning)
proposed by Kawato and Gomi (1992) hypothesized that error signals are provided
by premotor circuits, including the motor cortical circuits.
However, neuroimaging studies to date have not indicated
whether motor cortices encode error signals. Preceding human imaging studies
unanimously implicated parietal regions, such as areas 2, 5 and 7, in
representing reaching errors.
In the current study, Inoue and colleagues were successful for
the first time in inducing trial-by-trial "adaptation" in voluntary
arm movements by artificial electrical stimulation of the premotor cortex (PM)
or the primary motor cortex (M1).
When the stimulation was terminated, the error (after-effect)
did not decrease at once but recovered with practice, as observed after typical
adaptation.
The direction of the increase in the error was opposite to the
"preferred" error direction of the neuron recorded in the stimulation
site. The results clearly show that the motor cortices submit error signals
that drive adaptation in voluntary arm movements, as predicted by the feedback
error learning scheme.
The novel technique to artificially "improve" a
motor skill by a small amount of stimulation would be applicable to performance
enhancement in athletes as well as for restoring motor control in neurological
patients.
No comments:
Post a Comment